Posts Tagged ‘Federal Laws’

Say, Why Don’t We Let Same Corrupt IRS Agency That Targeted Dissidents To Run Our Health Care?

IRSObamacare

Dean Clancy raises some sobering questions about what will happen if the IRS is allowed to enforce Obamacare:

Revelations that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups for discriminatory treatment, and leaked confidential information about those groups to a left-wing outfit, ProPublica, should make us think twice about the White House’s plans to give the IRS even more authority — over our medicine cabinets.

That’s right. The IRS is being put in charge of enforcing the president’s health care law, Obamacare. The controversial law fills 2,801 pages; its various regulations, another 13,000. This mountain of paper forms a stack seven feet high, or, laid end to end, a paper trail stretching for two and a half miles. And it turns out no federal agency is given a more important role in implementing all that red tape than the IRS, the recipient of no fewer than 47 new duties and enforcement powers under the law.

Those duties include imposing tax penalties on individuals and businesses, and providing tax subsidies to millions of people who buy insurance through government “exchanges.” According to the IRS inspector general, the new health care powers and duties “represent the largest set of tax law changes the IRS has had to implement in more than 20 years.”

Hmm. Are we really prepared to put our health insurance system under the same agency that, as we’ve learned from the targeting scandal, took 1,138 days to approve just one non-exempt group’s tax application?

[…]  If citizens who hold a disfavored political view are already being harassed with excessive paperwork requests and delays, what’s preventing politically motivated IRS bureaucrats from leaking sensitive health information to groups like ProPublica, or subjecting those with disfavored medical conditions to discriminatory audits?

[…]  One of the many troubling facts to emerge from the targeting scandal has been the incredibly personal nature of the questions asked of groups applying for non-profit status. The IRS made some groups disclose all of their employees’ resumes, as well as information about the nature of personal relationships between employees. They even demanded to know the contents of a religious group’s prayers. If this level of detail is required for a rather simple business matter, determining tax-exempt status, imagine what the tax bureaucrats will do with our intimate health-related information.

Read more at the Daily Caller

The IRS, Obamacare, and You: The Government Is Coming for Your Health Insurance Records

An IRS Scandal Inseparable from Obamacare

Who Trusts The Scandal-Ridden IRS To Not Abuse Access To Confidential Patient Health Information?

Big Brother Healthcare: Obamacare Includes Random Health ‘Inspections,’ Mandatory Reporting Of Your Health Stats To Gov’t

IRS Steals Medical Records of 10 Million Americans

Farewell, Personal and Medical Privacy: ObamaTax is Here

No, You Can’t Google My Private Health Records: Obamacare’s Intrusive Data Grab

New HHS Regulation Creates Government Database of Your Private Health Information

IRS Admits To Targeting Conservative Groups For Harassment

Share

IRS Steals Medical Records of 10 Million Americans

med_records-620x465

Another day, another Obama scandal.

Erin McCann reports at Healthcare IT News:

The Internal Revenue Service is now facing a class action lawsuit over allegations that it improperly accessed and stole the health records of some 10 million Americans, including medical records of all California state judges.

According to a report by Courthousenews.com, an unnamed HIPAA-covered entity in California is suing the IRS, alleging that some 60 million medical records from 10 million patients were stolen by 15 IRS agents. The personal health information seized on March 11, 2011, included psychological counseling, gynecological counseling, sexual/drug treatment and other medical treatment data.

“This is an action involving the corruption and abuse of power by several Internal Revenue Service agents,” the complaint reads. “No search warrant authorized the seizure of these records; no subpoena authorized the seizure of these records; none of the 10,000,000 Americans were under any kind of known criminal or civil investigation and their medical records had no relevance whatsoever to the IRS search. IT personnel at the scene, a HIPPA facility warning on the building and the IT portion of the searched premises, and the company executives each warned the IRS agents of these privileged records,” it continued.

Read more at Healthcare IT News

John Hayward remarks:

How much money is on the line in this suit?  Oh, a mere $25,000 in compensatory damages.  Per violation.  Which adds up to “a minimum of $250 billion.”

Has Congress begun those emergency sessions to shut down ObamaCare yet?  What else do they need to hear?

Read more at Human Events

Lawsuit Accuses IRS of Stealing Medical Records of 10 Million Americans

Who Trusts The Scandal-Ridden IRS To Not Abuse Access To Confidential Patient Health Information?

Big Brother Healthcare: Obamacare Includes Random Health ‘Inspections,’ Mandatory Reporting Of Your Health Stats To Gov’t

Farewell, Personal and Medical Privacy: ObamaTax is Here

No, You Can’t Google My Private Health Records: Obamacare’s Intrusive Data Grab

New HHS Regulation Creates Government Database of Your Private Health Information

Share

Who Trusts The Scandal-Ridden IRS To Not Abuse Access To Confidential Patient Health Information?

obama-irs-obamacare-bully

If they’ve already proven themselves capable of targeting conservatives with only their tax information, what will they be capable of when they have even more information on their targets?

If they’ve already illegally released conservatives’ confidential tax information, what’s to stop them from leaking dissidents’ personal health information as well?

Peter Suderman warns:

Obamacare is not merely a massive overhaul of the health care system. It is also a substantial expansion of the Internal Revenue Service. That’s because the law relies on the tax collection agency to both enforce its individual mandate and administer the tax credits the law offers to subsidize the purchase of health insurance. Following recent revelations that agents in multiple IRS offices, including tax officials in Washington, targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny, a number of former and current Republican legislators are already counseling caution about the agency’s role in administering the law.

Concerns about the agency’s oversight of the health law are well-founded—and not only because of general concerns about the agency’s judgment.

For one thing, the IRS appears to have specifically targeted groups that opposed the health care law. According to The Washington Post, “although some of the groups were explicitly labeled ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot,’ others that came under intense scrutiny were focused on challenging the Affordable Care Act — known by many as Obamacare — or the integrity of federal elections.”

In other words, the agency has singled out Obamacare opponents for unusual treatment. That does not speak well of the agency’s ability to fairly carry out its duties under the law.

Read more at Reason

Indeed it does not.

The editorial board at Investors Business Daily is similarly concerned:

[O]bamaCare’s individual mandate takes effect in 2014, all Americans who file income-tax returns must deal with and report personal health information to the IRS.

The IRS will require the name and health insurance identification number of the taxpayer, the name and tax identification number of the health insurance company, the number of months the taxpayer was covered by this insurance plan and whether the plan was purchased in one of ObamaCare’s “exchanges.”

Heavy fines will be levied for failure to jump through all the government’s hoops.

The new tax mandates and penalties in ObamaCare will require up to 16,500 new IRS personnel to collect, examine and audit new tax information mandated on families and small businesses, according to an analysis by the Joint Economic Committee and the then-minority GOP staff of the House Ways & Means Committee in 2010.

Will the IRS enforce the mandate rules impartially, or will it go after only those who support individual liberty and oppose government encroachment on it?

Will ObamaCare resisters also be considered enemies of the state?

Read more at IBD

The IRS Targeting Scandal Could Disrupt Obamacare

Gingrich: IRS Targeting Scandal Raises Issues About Obamacare

IRS Claims It Can Read Your E-mail Without A Warrant

IRS Goes On Hiring Frenzy To Enforce Obamacare Penalties/Tax Hikes

Get Ready For More Taxes, More Intrusive IRS

Share

Obamacare Turns 3 As Costs Explode, Millions Of Jobs Threatened

obamacare4

It’s been three years since Obamacare was rammed down our throats, and damage is already apparent, even before it is fully implemented.

Paul Bedard warns at the Washington Examiner:

Over one-third of the 9.1 million full-time jobs among America’s diverse business franchises could be cut back or eliminated by Obamacare as small businesses struggle to maintain profitability while coughing up money to pay for Washington-mandated health care coverage, according to the International Franchise Association.

Read more at the Washington Examiner

John Merline at Investors Business Daily lists other nasty features that are finally coming to light:

Cause premiums to skyrocket. In December, state insurance commissioners warned Obama administration officials that the law’s market regulations would likely cause “rate shocks,” particularly for younger, healthier people forced by ObamaCare to subsidize premiums for those who are older and sicker.

“We are very concerned about what will happen if essentially there is so much rate shock for young people that they’re bound not to purchase (health insurance) at all,” said California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones.

That same month, Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini said ObamaCare will likely cause premiums to double for some small businesses and individuals.

And a more recent survey of insurers in five major cities by the American Action Forum found they expect premiums to climb an average 169%.

Cost people their jobs. The Federal Reserve’s March beige book on economic activity noted that businesses “cited the unknown effects of the Affordable Care Act as reasons for planned layoffs and reluctance to hire more staff.”

Around the same time, Gallup reported a surge in part-time work in advance of ObamaCare’s employer mandate. It found that part-timers accounted for almost 21% of the labor force, up from 19% three years ago.

Meanwhile, human resources consulting firm Adecco found that half of the small businesses it surveyed in January either plan to cut their workforce, not hire new workers, or shift to part-time or temporary help because of ObamaCare.

Tax the middle class. IBD reported in February that much of the $800 billion in tax hikes imposed by ObamaCare will end up hitting the middle class, including $45 billion in mandate penalties, $19 billion raised by limiting medical expense deductions, $24 billion through strict limits on flexible spending accounts, plus another $5 billion because ObamaCare bans using FSAs to buy over-the-counter drugs.

Read more at Investors Business Daily

It’s never too soon to repeal Obamacare

Obamacare Costs, Victims Increase As Full Implementation Nears

A Surgeon Cuts to the Heart of the ObamaCare Nightmare

Why Health Care Spending Will Explode Under ObamaCare: Evidence From Medicare

Three Years Later, Obamacare Is Even Less Popular

Obamacare at Three Years: A Broke Program for Early Retirees

Media Reports On ObamaCare Problems… Three-Years Late

Top Ten ObamaCare Horror Stories the Media Are Covering Up

Obamacare May Cost Small Business ‘Whiners’ 65% of Annual Profits

6 in 10 Docs Plan to Retire Early Due To Obamacare

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

Buy Insurance Or Pay A Fine – Rules for Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Officially Released

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

Will Employers be Blamed for the Latest Obamacare Outrage?

Obamacare official: “Let’s just make sure it’s not a third-world experience

Share

Boehner Agrees To Fund Obamacare In Next Continuing Resolution; Won’t Risk ‘Shutting Down the Government’

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Worthless <censored><censored><censored>!!!

Elizabeth Harrington reports at CNS News:

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he would not include language to defund Obamacare in the continuing resolution bill when it returns to the House, stating, “our goal” is “not to shut down the government.”

Read more at CNS News

Why on earth are they so afraid of a government shutdown?  It certainly didn’t kill us in the 90’s – most people can’t even remember how (or if) it even affected them!

Maybe what they’re REALLY afraid of is Americans realizing that their lives can go merrily along just fine – and a lot freer – without Big Government interference every step of the way.    That we really don’t need them as much as they need us (and our money) to legitimize their existence.

Thankfully, it appears there are at least a few Republicans in Washington with some spine left:

All Republican members of the Senate voted to defund Obamacare as an amendment to the Continuing Budget Resolution. The vote definitely puts a little heat on certain Dem. Senators up for re-election in 2014.

House Republican leadership recently pushed through a Continuing Resolution that included funding for Obamacare, despite the protests of many members of the GOP. Speaker Boehner and House Majority Whip Eric Cantor received flak in conservative circles for rushing through a hasty vote.

The House of Representatives possesses the “power of the purse” under Constitutional law, so it is not required to fund the executive branch’s activities. It would be extremely rare to withhold funding for government programs, but if there ever was a program as unethical and fiscally ruinous ever devised, it would be Obamacare.

Read more at Independent Journal Review

Senate Republicans Do What Boehner, Cantor, and McCarthy Wouldn’t

Mark Levin calls for ouster of John Boehner [VIDEO]

House RINO’s Fully Fund Obamacare, Including HHS Assault On Religious Freedom

Boehner Folds: ‘Obamacare is the Law of the Land’

Obamacare Costs, Victims Increase As Full Implementation Nears

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

Share

Stack of Obamacare Regulations Measures Seven Feet Tall…So Far

Nanci Pelosi said we had to “pass the bill to find out what’s in it.”

Well, now we know what’s in it, thanks to a photo tweeted by Senator Mitch McConnell:

w620-59b510db640b9c0b86acc8ff6831603b

The stack of regulations is 7 feet tall…so far.   The regulations are still being written by bureaucrats, who do not have to submit them for a vote by the people or their representatives.

Obamacare Costs, Victims Increase As Full Implementation Nears

Defunding Obamacare Before It’s Too Late

States worry about rate shock during shift to new health law

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

Buy Insurance Or Pay A Fine – Rules for Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Officially Released

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

House Dems Push Once Again For ‘Public Option’ To Undermine Insurance Companies, Pave Way For Single-Payer

Share

House RINO’s Fully Fund Obamacare, Including HHS Assault On Religious Freedom

Boehner

This was the Republicans’ LAST CHANCE to stop the horror of Obamacare from being fully imposed on the American people, and they folded like a deck of cards.

Terence P. Jeffrey reports at CNS News:

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted 267-151 on Wednesday to approve a $982-billion continuing resolution (CR) to fund the federal government through the rest of fiscal 2013 that fully funds the implementation of Obamacare during that period.

The House Republican leaders turned aside requests from groups of conservative members to include language in the bill that would have withheld funding for implementation of all of Obamacare, or, alternatively, that would have withheld funding for the Obamacare regulation that requires health-plans to provide cost-free coverage for sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs.

Read more at CNS News

Every last RINO who voted for this should be primaried out of their seats.   They are traitors against the American people, the constitution, and liberty.

Daniel Horowitz observes at Red State:

Watching the filibuster, the thought occurred to me that this is exactly what should have been done with Obamacare in 2009/2010.  Why didn’t Mitch McConnell use every parliamentary procedure to block Obamacare?  More relevant to today, these same senators should engage in the same educational filibuster against funding Obamacare next week when the Senate considers the CR.   If nothing else, we’re long overdue for a national discussion over Obamacare, personal liberty, and free markets.  We need to take this #StandWithRand show and run with it.

Read more at Red State

GOP Leaders Break 72-Hr Pledge: Rush 269-Page $982B CR to Vote 48 Hrs After Posting

Boehner Folds: ‘Obamacare is the Law of the Land’

Obamacare Costs, Victims Increase As Full Implementation Nears

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

Obama Administration: We Will Still Force Christians to Act Against Their Faith

Share

Obamacare Costs, Victims Increase As Full Implementation Nears

Obamacare doing less for fewer and costing more

View on YouTube

We tried to warn you….

First on Obamacare’s hit list…children in poverty:

Come January, many children currently enrolled in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) will be compulsorily moved out of their current health plans and into state-run Medicaid plans – as a result of Obamacare.

Read more at the American Enterprise Institute

Next, seniors dependent on Medicare:

During the 2012 election campaign, Democrats denied that ObamaCare made $716 billion in cuts to Medicare in order to provide funding toward $1.9 trillion in new entitlement spending over the next ten years.

In an announcement on Friday, however, the Obama administration revealed that it would be significantly reducing funding for Medicare, a move that one health insurance analyst said “would turn almost every plan in the industry unprofitable.”

[…]   Regarding the cuts, America’s Health Insurance Plans’ (AHIP) president Karen Ignagni said, “Washington cannot tax and cut Medicare Advantage this much and not expect seniors to be harmed.”

Read more at Breitbart

Who’s pushing grandma off a cliff, again?

Young adults are not spared the bruising mandates of Obamacare, either:

Younger, healthier people, many of whom voted for Mr. Obama in droves, will see their insurance premiums climb sharply as Obamacare demands that insurers provide them with more medical coverage than they want or need.

[…]  Mark Bertolini, CEO of Aetna Inc. — the nation’s third-largest health insurance company — warned at the end of 2012 that Americans will face a “premium rate shock” when the president’s tidal wave of regulations kick in next year.

Mr. Bertolini predicts unsubsidized insurance premiums will shoot up by 20 percent to 50 percent, on average.

Those numbers may be just for the lucky ones. Some consumers will see their costs double. “We’re going to see some markets go up as much as 100 percent,” Mr. Bertolini told Bloomberg News.

Read more at the Washington Times

In less than a year, Americans will be hit with not only higher insurance premiums, but massive tax increases:

While much of the dialogue on healthcare reform centers on the federal mandate of health coverage for all Americans – which many conservatives call the largest tax increase in U.S history – less attention is being given to the massive sales tax increase on the purchase of health insurance also implicit within the legislation that will dramatically escalate costs for employers and consumers.

[T]he tax increases that remain on the books will cost taxpayers more than $675 billion over the next ten years. Chief among these will be the sales tax on the purchase of health insurance, totaling $101.7 billion, and making it larger than all the other industry-specific taxes combined.

The health insurance tax will add a financial burden on families and small businesses at a time when they can least afford it, and it should be repealed, ” says AHIP, a trade association representing health insurance industry providers, in today’s call for the repeal of the health insurance tax before it can take affect.

Read more at Forbes

The costs and regulations are so onerous, some insurance companies are already warning they may not participate in the state exchanges at all:

Last month, the CEO of the nation’s largest health insurance company warned that he and his peers may balk at participating in Obamacare’s insurance exchanges — online, government-run portals where consumers and small businesses without conventional employer-sponsored coverage may shop for policies starting next year.

[…]  That’s ominous news for Obamacare. If insurers don’t participate in the law’s exchanges, then consumers who had hoped to secure affordable coverage through the new marketplaces will instead find few choices and high prices. Taxpayers could be hit hard, too, as higher premiums in the exchanges will require more public spending on subsidies.

Read more at Forbes

Due to rising costs, many businesses and individuals may simply choose not to buy health insurance:

[A]s ObamaCare’s official launch date approaches, even its backers are beginning to admit that the law could actually create powerful incentives for millions of people and thousands of businesses to drop their coverage, despite the mandate.

[…]  “We are very concerned,” California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones told federal health officials at a December meeting, “if there is so much rate shock for young people that they’re bound not to purchase (health insurance) at all.”

The cause of this rate shock is simple: ObamaCare imposes what is called “community rating” on insurance companies, effectively forcing them to charge the young and healthy more so they can charge older and sicker consumers less.

[…]  ObamaCare also forbids insurance companies from turning anyone down — a reform called “guaranteed issue” — which also will provide an incentive for some to drop coverage, knowing they can get it back any time.

“Even with the tax penalty … some healthy people would avoid purchasing coverage until they are sick,” Howard Shapiro, director of public policy at the Alliance of Community Health Plans, told regulators .

The problem is that if the young and healthy drop coverage, the result would be what the industry calls a “death spiral.” Premiums will climb as the pool of insured gets sicker, causing still more to cancel their policies.

Read more at Investors Business Daily

Of course, the plan all along has been to bankrupt insurance companies and force the creation of a single-payer system.

Along the way to their Socialist Utopia, the poor, young and elderly are hurt, middle-class taxpayers get slammed, hours are cut, jobs are lost, and  religious freedoms are violated.

Ask them if they care.

Defunding Obamacare Before It’s Too Late

States worry about rate shock during shift to new health law

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

Buy Insurance Or Pay A Fine – Rules for Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Officially Released

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

House Dems Push Once Again For ‘Public Option’ To Undermine Insurance Companies, Pave Way For Single-Payer

Share

CBO: 7 Million To Lose Health Insurance Because Of Obamacare

obama-then-i-said-if-you-like-your-health-plan-you-can-keep-it

Surprise!

Remember when Obama made this statement?

“Let me be exactly clear about what health care reform means to you…if you’ve got health insurance, you like your doctors, you like your plan, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan.  Nobody is talking about taking that away from you.”

I’ll put it this way: if it begins with “let me be clear,” it’s guaranteed to be a lie.  “Let me clear” is code for, “make sure you listen to my whitewash talking points to hide what’s REALLY going on.”

Now, four years later, Stephen Dinan at The Washington Times reports what we all knew was coming:

President Obama’s health care law will push 7 million people out of their job-based insurance coverage — nearly twice the previous estimate, according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday.

CBO said that this year’s tax cuts have changed the incentives for businesses and made it less attractive to pay for insurance, meaning fewer will decide to do so. Instead, they’ll choose to pay a penalty to the government, totaling $13 billion in higher fees over the next decade.

Read more at the Washington Times

Health Insurance Rates Skyrocketing Thanks To ‘Affordable Health Care Act’

Buy Insurance Or Pay A Fine – Rules for Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Officially Released

Obamacare Regs Slam Middle Class Families With Fines If They Can’t Afford Insurance, Cheapest Plan Will Be $20K Per Family

House Dems Push Once Again For ‘Public Option’ To Undermine Insurance Companies, Pave Way For Single-Payer

Share

Family-Owned Dairy Raided, Shut Down By FDA For Making Cheese From Raw Milk

Morningland Dairy raided and another family business destroyed 01/25/13

View on YouTube

The FDA is notoriously prejudiced against raw dairy products, and if they personally are opposed to consuming them, fine!  But what constitutional authority do they have to tell American citizens what they can and cannot eat and drink?   Answer: NONE.   With the government takeover of health care, however, you can rest assured that tyrannical attempts to control your diet will increase, not decrease.

The FDA, like so many other federal bureaucracies, has become a tyrannical, unelected, unaccountable apparatus for the Nanny State to rule over Americans instead of representing and serving them.   Their goal is not to protect citizens from harming one another, but to protect us from our own choices by restricting them and making them for us.   But this abuse of government power is not a victimless crime.

This small, family-armed dairy is the latest casualty in a long line of victims of government abuse and over-regulation.   Will your business be next?

KY3 News reports:

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Mo. — After a two and a half year legal battle, 15 tons of cheese made and aged near Mountain View was hauled to a dump.  To fans of natural foods, it is monumental waste and over-regulation.  To Missouri’s Milk Board, it’s merely protecting public health.

“I see the destruction of what my wife and I and family have worked to build,” said Joseph Dixon, owner ofMorningland Dairy.

Dixon and his family aren’t the only ones outraged by the trashing of about 30,000 pounds of cheese produced on the farm in Howell County.

[…]   “They really haven’t found anything, no sicknesses, no illnesses in 30 years. But it’s what-if.  And in the United States of America, if what-if now wins, we have no country left,” Dixon said.

Both Howell County Court and the Missouri Court of Appeals sided with the milk board’s decision to destroy all the cheese.

“We asked for trial by jury; we were denied because it was a regulation, not a law.  It wasn’t passed by congress,” said Dixon.

A couple of years ago, the Dixons still had hope of someday making cheese again and were milking daily, but now, the milking barn is empty because the dairy herd is gone.

“If I tried to start back up, it would cost so much to get it in the cooler, and then, if they find, quote, one thing they can complain about, one thing, I’m shut down again, and every bit of that has to be destroyed,” said Dixon.

Read more at KY3 News

Pete Kennedy writes at Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund:

The Milk Board shut down Morningland’s manufacturing operation and ordered all cheese at the facility embargoed on August 26, 2010 after receiving a report from the California Department of Food and Agriculture that Morningland cheese seized in a raid of the Rawesome food club in Venice, California in June 2010 had tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes andStaphyloccocus aureus. Not a single block of cheese in the warehouse had the same batch number as the cheese seized in the Rawesome raid. A Milk Board inspector initially told Joe Dixon that he would only be shut down for a few days—but that changed when FDA stepped up their involvement in the case a short time later and pressured the Milk Board not to let Morningland resume their operations.

On October 1, 2010 the Milk Board sent the Dixons a letter requesting that they destroy the entire inventory of cheese at the facility; when the Dixons refused, the Milk Board filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Howell County to obtain an order for the destruction of the Morningland cheese.

After a two-day trial before Judge David Dunlop, the judge issued a decision on February 23, 2011 ordering the destruction of the cheese. Morningland appealed the decision but on September 27, 2012 the Court of Appeals sided with the Milk Board. A petition to the Missouri Supreme Court to hear the case was rejected onDecember 18, paving the way for the destruction of the cheese to take place.

Neither the Milk Board nor FDA ever tested any of the cheese stored at Morningland. FDA did take 100 environmental swabs at the facility, all of which tested negative for listeria. There was no accusation that any cheese Morningland produced had made anyone sick; there had never been any reported illness from the consumption of Morningland products in the thirty years the farmstead cheese operation had been in business.

The Morningland case was about FDA’s agenda to restrict access to raw dairy products with the eventual goal of banning them. The agency doesn’t hesitate in sacrificing a business like the Dixons’ in order to move its agenda along.

What message does this send to entrepreneurs who are considering starting their own business and creating jobs?  Who wants to take the risk of running afoul of busybody bureaucrats with an ax to grind?

Save Morningland Dairy – Sponsor a Cheese!

Data Shows Obama’s Anti-Business Regulations Responsible For Holding Back Entrepreneurs

Amish Farmer Closes Farm After Feds Harass, Issue Injuction Against Him For Selling Raw Milk

Three Arrested, Charged For Distributing…*Gasp!*…Raw Milk Products *UPDATED*

Feds sting Amish farmer selling raw milk locally

The FDA vs Raw Milk and the Constitution

Government raids increasing on farms and private food-supply clubs

Food freedom under attack

Share

Health Insurance Rates Skyrocketing Thanks To ‘Affordable Health Care Act’

Healthcare premiums rise

There’s nothing “affordable” about it!

Even the New York Times finally admits it:

Health insurance companies across the country are seeking and winning double-digit increases in premiums for some customers, even though one of the biggest objectives of the Obama administration’s health care law was to stem the rapid rise in insurance costs for consumers.

Particularly vulnerable to the high rates are small businesses and people who do not have employer-provided insurance and must buy it on their own.

Read more at the New York Times

Exactly as it was intended to do…they’re driving people off of private insurance plans and onto government healthcare plans, bankrupting the insurance industry in the process.

Ed Morrissey at Hot Air asks:

Why should this surprise?  The must-issue regulation built into ObamaCare increases costs for the insurers, who cannot draw all of the needed revenues from the high-risk pool, thanks to mandates on rates.  That means those costs have to get spread out to everyone in the pool.  This is nothing more than Risk Pool 101, a course that Congress flunked repeatedly in the ObamaCare debate.

And why are rates rising higher on individual premiums than employer-based premiums?  First off, the economics of aggregation are always going to work out that way; insurers want large groups of customers, and it’s less costly in the long run to find customers that way rather than one at a time.  I’d guess that the employer-aggregate pool might generate somewhat lower costs than the general population too (especially after must-issue), but that’s just speculation.  What isn’t speculation is that ObamaCare heavily regulates the individual markets in 2014 based on a law that doesn’t have many details in how that is supposed to be accomplished, based on state exchanges that may never exist in more than half of the states.  In that kind of environment, can anyone blame the insurers for basing premiums on worst-case scenarios this year?

None of this surprises those who both understand risk pools and the dynamic reaction to regulation.  It’s amusing to see everyone else be shocked, shocked that ObamaCare ends up driving costs upward even further.

Read more at Hot Air

Health Premiums Up $3,000; Obama Vowed $2,500 Cut

Study: Health Insurance Rates Will Go Up for Young Adults Under Obamacare

What a… surprise: Health care law passed to stem rapid rise in insurance costs causing rapid rise in insurance costs

Oregonians who buy own health insurance face major cost changes

CBO: Obamacare Will Leave 30 Million Uninsured

Feud over Obama health care reforms to intensify in coming months

The Slow Dismantling of Obamacare

Employers Likely To Drop Health Coverage As Rates Climb Due To Obamacare 

Obamacare: Gathering Storm Threatens Quality, Availability Of Medical Care

Share

White House Mandates All New Cars Sold Must Have ‘Black Boxes’

Car-Black-BOX-432x350

This is the problem with the unconstitutional “fourth branch” of the federal government: unelected, unaccountable bureaucracies.

This proposal never went to the voters or their representatives in congress, who are supposed to pass new laws.  Instead, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration asked for this new mandate, and the White House approved it.   Your privacy behind the wheel was just taken away without so much as a vote.

This is NOT how our founders designed our republic to work.   If we don’t rein in all these departments, agencies and bureaucracies that routinely abuse unconstitutional powers, we will wake up one day to find all our freedoms GONE.

Kurt Ernst reports at the Christian Science Monitor:

The White House Office of Management has approved a request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to mandate event data recorders, commonly referred to as “black boxes,” in 100-percent of new vehicles sold.

In the very near future, then, the car you drive may monitor your every action behind the wheel, from speed to steering angle to brake pressure to whether or not you and your front seat passengers are buckled up.

If that makes you paranoid, this won’t help much: if you drive a newer car, chances are there’s already some kind of black box logging your actions, something that most consumers are blissfully unaware of. Today, The Detroit News tells us, 91.6 percent of light-duty autos utilize black boxes, so the latest directive would merely take that to 100 percent.

Read more at the Christian Science Monitor

The Associated Press reports that this is raising privacy concerns (ya think??):

The idea is to gather information that can help investigators determine the causes of accidents and lead to safer vehicles. But privacy advocates say government regulators and automakers are spreading an intrusive technology without first putting in place policies to prevent misuse of the information collected.

Data collected by the recorders is increasingly showing up in lawsuits, criminal cases and high-profile accidents.  […]

There’s no opt-out. It’s extremely difficult for car owners to disable the recorders. Although some vehicle models have had recorders since the early 1990s, a federal requirement that automakers disclose their existence in owner’s manuals didn’t go into effect until three months ago. Automakers that voluntarily put recorders in vehicles are also now required to gather a minimum of 15 types of data.

Besides the upcoming proposal to put recorders in all new vehicles, the traffic safety administration is also considering expanding the data requirement to include as many as 30 additional types of data such as whether the vehicle’s electronic stability control was engaged, the driver’s seat position or whether the front-seat passenger was belted in. Some manufacturers already are collecting the information. Engineers have identified more than 80 data points that might be useful.

Privacy complaints have gone unheeded so far. The traffic safety administration says it doesn’t have the authority to impose limits on how the information can be used and other privacy protections. About a dozen states have some law regarding data recorders, but the rest do not.

Right now we’re in an environment where there are no rules, there are no limits, there are no consequences and there is no transparency,” said Lillie Coney, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy advocacy group. “Most people who are operating a motor vehicle have no idea this technology is integrated into their vehicle.”

Read more at the Mercury News

Feds Want ‘Black Boxes’ in New Cars, But Who Will Be Tracking You?

Mandatory “black boxes” in new autos inch us ever-forward to 1984

Report: Smart Meters Will Record Personal Energy Use Habits

New HHS Regulation Creates Government Database of Your Private Health Information

What 4th Amendment? Gov’t May Now Collect, Catalog, and Store All Private Information

Share

The Tragedy Of America’s Welfare State: Head Of A Household Making Minimum Wage Has More Disposable Income Than A Family Making $60K A Year

Any of you Christian Socialists want to explain to me how this is supposedly moral and Biblical?

Tyler Durden writes at Zero Hedge:

Tonight’s stunning financial piece de resistance comes from Wyatt Emerich of The Cleveland Current. In what is sure to inspire some serious ire among all those who once believed Ronald Reagan that it was the USSR that was the “Evil Empire”, Emmerich analyzes disposable income and economic benefits among several key income classes and comes to the stunning (and verifiable) conclusion that “a one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimum wage) has more disposable income than a family making $60,000 a year.” And that excludes benefits from Supplemental Security Income disability checks. America is now a country which punishes those middle-class people who not only try to work hard, but avoid scamming the system. Not surprisingly, it is not only the richest and most audacious thieves that prosper – it is also the penny scammers at the very bottom of the economic ladder that rip off the middle class each and every day, courtesy of the world’s most generous entitlement system. Perhaps if Reagan were alive today, he would wish to modify the object of his once legendary remark.

From Emmerich:

You can do as well working one week a month at minimum wage as you can working $60,000-a-year, full-time, high-stress job.

My chart tells the story. It is pretty much self-explanatory.

Stunning? Just do it yourself.

Almost all welfare programs have Web sites where you can call up “benefits calculators.” Just plug in your income and family size and, presto, your benefits are automatically calculated.

The chart is quite revealing. A one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimu wage) has more disposable income than a amily making $60,000 a year.

And if that wasn’t enough, here is one that will blow your mind:

If the family provider works only one week a month at minimum wage, he or she makes 92 percent as much as a provider grossing $60,000 a year.

Read more at Zero Hedge

Is it any wonder why some people have decided it’s easier to just stop looking for work altogether?

In another article five days later, Durden explains:

Exactly two years ago, some of the more politically biased progressive media outlets (who are quite adept at creating and taking down their own strawmen arguments, if not quite as adept at using an abacus, let alone a calculator) took offense at our article “In Entitlement America, The Head Of A Household Of Four Making Minimum Wage Has More Disposable Income Than A Family Making $60,000 A Year.” In it we merely explained what has become the painful reality in America: for increasingly more it is now more lucrative – in the form of actual disposable income – to sit, do nothing, and collect various welfare entitlements, than to work. This is graphically, and very painfully confirmed, in the below chart from Gary Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (a state best known for its broke capital Harrisburg). As quantitied, and explained by Alexander, “the single mom is better off earnings gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045.

We realize that this is a painful topic in a country in which the issue of welfare benefits, and cutting (or not) the spending side of the fiscal cliff, have become the two most sensitive social topics. Alas, none of that changes the matrix of incentives for most Americans who find themselves in a comparable situation: either being on the left side of minimum US wage, and relying on benefits, or move to the right side at far greater personal investment of work, and energy, and… have the same disposable income at the end of the day.

Read more at Zero Hedge

 

Cloward-Piven Strategy In Action: Welfare spending jumps 32% in four years

Over 100 Million Now Receiving Federal Welfare

Is President Obama Creating A Nation Of Dependents?

US Gov’t Is Bankrupt, System of Republican Constitutional Gov’t Is At Stake

America Before The Entitlement State

Share

Cloward-Piven Strategy In Action: Welfare spending jumps 32% in four years

The Cloward-Piven strategy to overwhelm the system with impossible demands is doing exactly what it was designed to do: eventually collapse the system to pave the way for a communist revolution.

Stephen Dinan reports at The Washington Times:

Federal welfare spending has grown by 32 percent over the past four years, fattened by President Obama’s stimulus spending and swelled by a growing number of Americans whose recession-depleted incomes now qualify them for public assistance, according to numbers released Thursday.

Federal spending on more than 80 low-income assistance programs reached $746 billion in 2011, and state spending on those programs brought the total to $1.03 trillion, according to figures from the Congressional Research Service and the Senate Budget Committee.

That makes welfare the single biggest chunk of federal spending — topping Social Security and basic defense spending.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee who requested the Congressional Research Service report, said the numbers underscore a fundamental shift in welfare, which he said has moved from being a Band-Aid and toward a more permanent crutch.

Read more at The Washington Times

And that’s exactly how Obama and the Democrats want it: creating a permanent dependency class who are eager to vote for more benefits at the expense of others.

Welfare Spending Shattering All-Time Highs

Welfare was government’s single largest budget item in FY 2011 at approx. $1.03 trillion

Over 100 Million Now Receiving Federal Welfare

Obama Buying Votes With Welfare Handouts

Welfare State Grows by Nearly 19% Under Obama – to Almost $1 Trillion a Year

Is President Obama Creating A Nation Of Dependents?

US Gov’t Is Bankrupt, System of Republican Constitutional Gov’t Is At Stake

Share

Hungry Students Rebel Against Michelle Obama’s School Lunch Restrictions

We Are Hungry

View on YouTube

Michelle Obama claims the new school lunch restrictions teach students healthy eating habits. Here’s what they REALLY teach:

1. Your body and personal health care decision belong to the state.

2. Your individual needs and freedoms must be surrendered for the greater good of “equality.” Therefore, a 220lb. linebacker will be granted no more food than a 110lb hipster. Still hungry? Tough.

3. Whatever the government provides (using your confiscated tax dollars), it controls and rations (healthcare, anyone?).

4. Don’t try to think for yourself. You’re not as smart as the “expert” ruling class. They know what’s best – you don’t. Just do what you’re told.

5.  “Free” government lunches and services will only cost you one thing: your liberty.

Tara Dodrill writes at The Inquisitr:

The so-called healthy lunch mandates restrict the amount of protein a school cafeteria can serve; meat is no longer allowed on the breakfast menu, according to The Blaze. Wisconsin high school athletes are particularly outraged at new rules promoted by the United States Department of Agriculture and Michelle Obama. Many of the students perform farm chores before school, have sports practice after school, and do not get home to eat dinner until 8 pm. The teenagers and some concerned teachers have spoken out against the protein and calorie restrictions, claiming that children are going hungry.

Even though the new regulations have reduced the portion size of many items, the cost of a school lunch has increased by 20 to 25 cents per tray in many areas. High school cafeterias are now prohibited from supplying lunch trays which contain more than 850 calories. The standard recommendations for caloric intake is different for males and females, but the USDA did not see fit to make that distinction when drafting the new legislation. A senior football player is allowed no more calories than a 100-pound freshman girl.

Public schools are allegedly seeing a decrease in the number of lunches ordered since the new rules took effect this school year. Students who attend school with an open lunch policy are simply walking home, to nearby fast food restaurants, or to convenience stores to calm their rumbling bellies. Grabbing a bag of chips and a candy bar to supplement the scant offerings on a cafeteria lunch tray is surely not what Michelle Obama and the USDA had in mind when attempting to thwart the mounting obesity problem in the United States. Poor students who do not have any cash in their pockets to go elsewhere for lunch are forced to make do with what is offered at the school.

Read more at The Inquisitr

Of course, some hungry students are more “equal” than others.  The Obamas’ girls’ school still serves pizza:

Interestingly, though, the revolt over feta cheese and vegetables might not come to Sidwell Friends, the elite private school the Obama kids attend in Washington, D.C.

According to the school’s website, pepperoni pizza is on the menu today:

French Mushroom Soup
Classic Caesar Salad
Boston Bean Salad
Pepperoni Flatbread Pizza
Variety Flatbread Pizza
Variety Veggie Flatbread Pizzas
Sauteed Local Greens
Sliced Melon

Read more at The Weekly Standard

Complaints Mount Against Michelle Obama’s New Lunch Menu 

School lunch calorie limits leave bitter taste with some Kansas students

Food Police: Massachusetts Schools Ban Bake Sales And Birthday Cakes

Nanny State Inspects Sack Lunches, Forces Children To Purchase Gov’t Approved Food Instead

Michelle Obama on Deciding What Kids Eat: ‘We Can’t Just Leave it Up to The Parents’

The Child: America’s Battle for the Next Generation

Share
Become A Subscriber!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Follow ConservThoughts on Twitter

Support This Blog!

This blog is a labor of love for you, the reader who loves this country and wants to stay informed of the threats to our liberty and how to make a difference. I receive no compensation for blogging and pay for web services out of our family budget. Would you consider making a small donation to help? Just like the fight for liberty, every little bit makes a difference!

Categories
Archives
Note: Please keep your comments respectful and relevant to the topic at hand. I will not approve ad hominem attacks or profanity. Nor will I approve comments by advertisers using their business or product and hyperlink as their username. This blog is not a forum for free advertising.
Free Gift!
FREE Pocket Copy of the Declaration & Constitution!
PJTV
Change A Child’s Life!

Get stickers, T-Shirts and more at the Patriot Depot!

Preparedness Pantry Blog

Copyright Trolls Sue Thoughts From A Conservative Mom

Join The Fight!
You Are Visitor
Powered by web analytics software.
Learn more about us debt.
DiscoverTheNetworks.org
Help A Friend In Need!
A non-profit organization facilitating generosity between people.
Financial Freedom
Get on the road to financial peace with Dave Ramsey's Financial Peace University!

Journey to true financial freedom with Crown Financial Ministries!